Adrian Dunkley · AI Boss
0%

Frameworks  /  The AI Framework for Schools and Teachers  /  Module 6

Module 6 of 8  ·  10 min

Equity, Access and Inclusion

Brought to you by Adrian Dunkley, the AI Boss  ·  Practical AI frameworks for schools and families

What you will learn

  • See how unmanaged AI access widens the gap a school exists to close.
  • Provide supervised access so capability does not track family income.
  • Use AI to support students with additional needs without lowering expectations.

Equity is the narrow pillar that holds the others honest. If AI help is only available to students with a phone, a data plan, and a quiet room at home, the school has just widened the gap. This module makes access a design decision, not a hope.

The equity trap

Allow AI but leave access to chance, and the students who benefit are the ones who already had the most: their own device, home internet, and a parent who can guide them. The students who most need the school's help are the ones locked out. Equity here is not a values statement. It is a budget line and a timetable decision.

Provision, not permission

The answer is supervised access on school devices and school time, so a student without a phone or home internet is not shut out of a skill their classmates are building. This does not require a device for every child on day one. It requires a plan: booked lab time, a set of shared devices, and approved tools that work without personal accounts where possible.

  • Every student can reach approved AI tools during school hours, regardless of what they own.
  • Tasks that assume AI use have a supervised in-school path to complete them.
  • Students with additional learning needs are considered first, not last, when tools are chosen.
  • Language learners can use AI support openly, without it being mistaken for cheating.

    • Support without lowering the bar

    Used well, AI can widen access to the curriculum: a patient explainer for a student who needs an idea three different ways, a reader for text that would otherwise be a barrier, a translation bridge for a new arrival. The discipline is to use these to help more students reach the same high standard, not to quietly expect less of some of them.

    What the frameworks say

    Fairness is one of the six principles in the Australian Framework, which asks that AI use be accessible and inclusive and does not disadvantage any group. The AILit Framework frames AI literacy as an entitlement for all learners, not an advantage for some.

    • Australian Framework for Generative AI in Schools (Australian Government, Department of Education (2023))
    • AILit Framework (European Commission and OECD, with Code.org)

    Sources for this module

    Mark this module complete
    ← PreviousModule 5: Data Privacy, Safety and SecurityNext →Module 7: Phased Rollout and Change Management